tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3682550116445790117.post3676783468745680669..comments2024-03-23T09:59:53.293+00:00Comments on LINEN ON THE HEDGEROW: Dedicated to those in the Vatican and those in the SSPX who scheme and distortRichard Collinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10826907710570316952noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3682550116445790117.post-80917086661323939492012-07-09T15:56:50.717+01:002012-07-09T15:56:50.717+01:00THE SSPX HAS SIGNED THE DOCTRINAL PREAMBLE ACCEPTI...THE SSPX HAS SIGNED THE DOCTRINAL PREAMBLE ACCEPTING VATICAN COUNCIL II AS A CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION: THEY REJECT THE MULLER, SCHONBORN,KOCH INTERPRETATION WITH AN EXPLICIT LG 8 AND LG 16 <br />Archbishop Augustine Di Noia does the Holy Spirit teach that LG 8 and LG 16 are known to us and not implicit?<br />http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/sspx-has-signed-doctrinal-preamble.html#links<br /><br />WILL THE FALSE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST FR.LEONARD FEENEY BE NOW ALSO MADE AGAINST THE SSPX? <br />http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/will-false-accusations-against.html#links<br /><br />THE VATICAN CURIA IS IN A CRISIS WITH THEIR POLITICAL VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II: SSPX SHOULD ASK THEM FOR REFERENCE TEXTS<br />http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/vatican-curia-is-in-crisis-with-their.html#linksCatholic Missionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025127342963192930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3682550116445790117.post-3392713471243960952012-07-09T15:55:47.451+01:002012-07-09T15:55:47.451+01:00Monday, July 9, 2012
The SSPX has accepted Vatican...Monday, July 9, 2012<br />The SSPX has accepted Vatican Council II according to the doctrinal preamble-they must ask Di Noia and Muller to accept the Council with implicit, known only to God LG 8 and LG 16<br /> <br />I have been asked in a comment by I Am Not Spartacus on the website The Bellarmine Report (Cardinal Levada Muffs Pope's Agreement with SSPX ) to explain an earlier comment of mine.<br /><br />I Am Not Spartacus<br />I am sorry, but I do not understand what is being claimed here.<br /><br />Dear Mr Andrades. In plain and simple language can you write what you think the SSPX is accepting in Vatican Two and what it is objecting to in Vatican Two?<br /><br />Lionel:<br />What is the SSPX accepting in Vatican Council II?<br /> The SSPX accepts Ad Gentes 7 which says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation.<br /><br />What is the SSPX objecting to?<br />The SSPX is really objecting to Lumen Gentium 8 and Lumen Gentium 16 being considered exceptions to AG 7 and to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The SSPX assumes that LG 8 and LG 16 contradict the SSPX position on other religions and ecumenism.<br /><br />I am not Spartacus <br />Are you claiming that Vatican Two essentially teaches Feenyism? <br /><br />Lionel:<br />Yes. Vatican Council II is in agreement with the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. In this sense it is in agreement with Fr. Leonard Feeney.<br /><br />If LG 8 ‘elements of sanctification’ and LG 16 (invincible ignorance and a good conscience) are considered implicit and known only to God, they do not contradict the literal interpretation of Fr. Leonard Feeney.<br /><br />There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney on outside the church there is no salvation.<br /><br />For Archbishop Di Noia LG 8 contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He mentioned this to Edward Pentin of the National Catholic Register when asked about extra ecclesiam nulla salus.<br /><br />The SSPX has accepted Vatican Council II according to the doctrinal preamble-they must ask Di Noia and Muller to accept the Council with implicit, known only to God LG 8 and LG 16.<br />-Lionel AndradesCatholic Missionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025127342963192930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3682550116445790117.post-24555368342342027152012-07-02T14:28:51.296+01:002012-07-02T14:28:51.296+01:00Thanks ACM....more power to your Guinness.Thanks ACM....more power to your Guinness.Richard Collinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10826907710570316952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3682550116445790117.post-71032491821653501802012-07-01T15:36:17.460+01:002012-07-01T15:36:17.460+01:00And this, goodly sir, is why I love this blog. Th...And this, goodly sir, is why I love this blog. Thanks for this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com